Fact-checking AI output
Professional fact-checkers have fast, proven techniques. This module adapts them for AI output.
Learning objectives
- Explain why AI shouldn't be used to verify itself
- Apply the SIFT method
- Use lateral reading to judge sources
- Check citations in four steps
- Prompt for verifiable output and triangulate important claims
3.1 Verify at the source
The single most important rule: don't verify an AI claim by asking the AI — or a second AI — whether it's true. Models can confidently "confirm" their own errors. Go to an independent, authoritative source.
3.2 The SIFT method
SIFT, developed by digital literacy expert Mike Caulfield and widely taught by universities and libraries, is a fast, practical approach that works well for AI output:
| Step | What to do with AI output |
|---|---|
| Stop | Pause before using or sharing. Do you know where this claim comes from? How much does it matter? |
| Investigate the source | If the AI cites a source, who is it? Is it authoritative on this topic? Does it exist? |
| Find better coverage | Search independently for the claim. What do trusted sources — regulators, official statistics, peer-reviewed research, reputable outlets — say? |
| Trace to the original | Follow claims, quotes and statistics back to the original context. Is the figure current, correctly quoted and not cherry-picked? |
3.3 Lateral reading
Professional fact-checkers don't read a source top to bottom to judge it. They read laterally: open new tabs and see what others say about the source and the claim. It's faster and more reliable than judging by how professional something looks — which, with AI, tells you nothing.
3.4 Checking citations
- Does it exist? Search the exact title. For academic papers use a library database or Google Scholar; for UK law use official sources such as legislation.gov.uk or the National Archives' Find Case Law service.
- Are the details right? Authors, year, publication and link.
- Does it say what's claimed? Find the relevant passage. AI often cites real sources for things they don't say.
- Is it current and authoritative? A 2019 blog post isn't evidence about 2026 regulation.
3.5 Prompt for verifiability
You can make checking easier from the start:
- Ask for sources with links for every key claim, and for confidence levels.
- Supply the sources yourself and say "answer only from these".
- Ask for direct quotes from documents, with page or section numbers.
- Ask "What are you least sure about in this answer?" — useful for prioritising, though not a substitute for checking.
3.6 Triangulation
For important claims, look for two or more independent, reliable sources that agree. If sources disagree, that's valuable information — report the disagreement rather than picking the answer you prefer.
Ask an AI tool: "What percentage of UK adults used generative AI in the last year? Give a source." Apply SIFT: stop, investigate the cited source, find better coverage (e.g. official statistics or Ofcom), and trace the figure to its original report. Was the AI's figure accurate, current and correctly described?
Key takeaways
- Verify at independent, authoritative sources — not by asking the AI.
- SIFT: Stop, Investigate the source, Find better coverage, Trace to the original.
- Read laterally: what do others say about this source?
- Citations: exists? details right? says what's claimed? current?
- Triangulate important claims; report disagreements.